Swedish broadcaster SVT announced over the weekend (article in swedish, sorry) that they are planning to broadcast all of their live shows on the web. “Awesome!”, you may think - the Swedes are really moving along with the digital age, giving the consumers what they want! Well, curb your enthusiasm.
As Sydsvenskan.se reports, SVT are also planning on claiming broadcast receiver licence from anyone owning a computer capable of accessing the Internet! And Swedish SVT are not alone. Here in Norway, the NRK have been thinking about the same strategy since 2006.
What this means, is that the national broadcasting companies want to charge you an annual fee because they are making their content available on the Internet. You’re not interested in their content? Well, why should they care!
I am an opponent of the broadcast receiver licence. I find it a rape of the society to claim a fee of over 2000 NOK (~390 USD) for only having a TV, when I rarely watch the national broadcasting channels, or listen to their radio stations. In addition to this I pay the monthly bills from my satellite provider. But enough about that. This is not what this blog post is about.
What I find outrageous is that a national instance wants to claim a fee from everyone, simply because they have made their material available on the Internet. I mean… you simply can’t do that. I have my strong doubts that such a suggestion will ever get through and accepted, but just the fact that someone can suggest it is quite frightening to me.
What if newspapers should start charging you a monthly fee, just because they are publishing their articles on the Internet? Would you accept that? Of course not! What if I sent you a bill twice a year which read “Licence fee for JaranBlog”? Don’t like my blog, or find any of these ramblings interesting? Well, see how much I care… Pay up, b**ch! Or lose your Internet access!
If you want to get paid for your online content, you implement a closed system where users have to pay to get access. My theory is that these broadcasting stations know that much of their content have a very narrow audience in many older generations and thus very few would be interested (or perhaps capable) of using their online paid service. Therefore, they propose this riddicilous licence and hope that some ignorant smooth talking politician will speak their case.